The New Direction in the Humanities Journal Collection offers an annual award for newly published research or thinking that has been recognized to be outstanding by members of the New Direction in the Humanities Research Network.
If Southern Vietnam literature (1954–1975) can be considered as a continuation of prewar culture (1932–1945) to a certain extent, then Northern Vietnam literature breaks away from prewar culture to create a new culture, namely, socialist realist culture, and a new type of reader who has yet to be seen in the history of literature: the reader-people. The entire North Vietnam education system was oriented toward communist ideology and became part of the propaganda machine. Mass education is an essential revolutionary strategy of politicized literature and art in socialist countries. Through various comprehensive and dominant cultural policies, the ultimate goal of this educational process was to create a unified mass of people and mobilize them to fight and sacrifice themselves for the revolutionary cause. The reader-people of socialist realist literature were the product of this comprehensive and dominant educational process. This article delves into several cultural and political mechanisms that served as a tool to create the reader-people as a hybrid triad consisting of authorities (party censorship agencies), party-led “red” writers and artists, and the masses as the readers. However, inadequacies remained after the construction of the reader-people, which is characteristic of the political services of socialist countries though beneficial for two primary goals: to build socialism in the north and liberate the south to reunify the country. In Vietnam, the reader-people gradually disappeared before the decline of socialist realist literature after 1975. This article contributes to the scholarship of socialist realist culture not limited to only Vietnam a specific analysis of the construction of the reader-people via all-encompassing and dominantly politicized cultural policies.
Mass education is an essential revolutionary strategy of politicized literature and art in socialist countries. Through various comprehensive and dominant cultural policies, the ultimate goal of this educational process was to create a unified mass of people and mobilize them to fight and sacrifice themselves for the revolutionary cause. The reader-people of socialist realist literature were the product of this comprehensive and dominant educational process. This article delves into several cultural and political mechanisms that served as a tool to create the reader-people as a hybrid triad consisting of authorities (party censorship agencies), party-led “red” writers and artists, and the masses as the readers. However, inadequacies remained after the construction of the reader-people, which is characteristic of the political services of socialist countries, though beneficial for two primary goals: to build socialism in the north and liberate the south to reunify the country. In Vietnam, the reader-people gradually disappeared before the decline of socialist realist literature after 1975. This article contributes to the scholarship of socialist realist culture, not limited to Vietnam. It provides a specific analysis of the construction of the reader-people via all-encompassing and dominantly politicized cultural policies.
This paper is a drastic revision of a Vietnamese article published on Nghiên cứu Văn học [Literary Studies]. This paper was supported by the Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences (Project title: 1945-1985 Vietnamese Literature in the Cultural Context of the Times, Grant No. 186/HĐKH-KHXH).
The author thanks the anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier version, which helped to shape this article into its present form and the New Directions in the Humanities Research Network and the Advisory Board for their selection to the International Award for Excellence for Volume 21 of The International Journal of the Humanities.
— Quoc Hieu LE
Post-Realism and Autobiografiction in Borys Fynkelshteyn’s It Came to Pass…
Dmytro Drozdovskyi, The International Journal of Literary Humanities, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp. 73–81
Cutting through Syria’s Silence: Trauma in Khalid Khalifa’s "No Knives in the Kitchens of this City"
Mattius Rischard, The International Journal of Literary Humanities, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp. 55–69
The Politics of Regressive Listening: Performance-as-Protest, Protest-as-Performance
Mattius Rischard, The International Journal of Critical Cultural Studies, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp. 11–27
Indigenization and Modernization: The Invention of a Truly Egyptian Drama
Hala Ghoneim, The International Journal of Critical Cultural Studies, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp. 73–87
Rethinking Nostalgia: Commodification Theory in Terms of the Allegory versus Symbol Debate
Mike Tadashi Sugimoto, The International Journal of the Humanities: Annual Review, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp. 11–24
Ecocriticism of Nineteenth-Century Taiwan in John Dodd’s “Formosa”
Li-Ru Lu, The International Journal of Literary Humanities, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp.1–8
Kenneth DiMaggio, The International Journal of Literary Humanities, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp.41–49
Anticipating Nietzsche: Culture and Chaos in “The House of Usher” and "Wuthering Heights"
Fred Mensch, The International Journal of the Humanities: Annual Review, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp.1–15
Cross-Cultural Studies and Aesthetics Discursive Transformations in China
Li Qingben, The International Journal of the Humanities: Annual Review, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp.113–122
Tama Weisman, The International Journal of the Humanities: Annual Review, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp.1–13
VideoPoetry: Collaboration as Imaginative Method
Peter Lutze, James Armstrong, and Laura Woodworth-Ney, International Journal of the Humanities: Annual Review, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp.107–122
Cultivating Moral Sensibilities through Aesthetic Education: The Power of Everyday Cosmopolitanism
Suzanne S. Choo, International Journal of the Humanities: Annual Review, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp.109–118